Jump to content

Talk:The Birth of a Nation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Birth of a Nation has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 21, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 6, 2018Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 8, 2010, February 8, 2012, February 8, 2015, and February 8, 2018.
Current status: Good article


Improvements to the article

[edit]

I am posting this text, which, although it is very complete, well referenced and written, has some minor problems that need to be corrected. First, there are passages without references, this is most noticeable in the sections "Consequences", "White House showing", "New opening titles on re-release", "Accolades" and "In popular culture". Second, the "Plot" section should not have a reference by default since the source is in the film itself, but what I don't understand is why there is one in the second paragraph and in the rest there is none, in this case either a reference should be put in the whole section or not at all, and third and last, reference 40 of the New York Times does have an elence for it to be added. For the moment I will not do a GAR because the article is very complete but even so these errors should be corrected. So I call @MagicatthemovieS: who was the one who nominated the article to review it. 2801:1CA:E:1411:DD57:CBA6:D356:E047 (talk) 18:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A month has passed and the problems have not been resolved, as it says they are easily solvable but no one has been interested. Please call @MagicatthemovieS: again to solve the problems. 2801:1CA:E:1411:62C:D6C:9D57:C071 (talk) 21:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove good article status

[edit]

This is a bad article. It's absurdly long, repetitive, and has extraordinary NPOV issues. LesbianTiamat (She/Her) (troll/pester) 14:05, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First Film Screened at White House Myth

[edit]

I posted a change to this article that clarified this myth, but it was reverted and all mention of the film's White House screening was removed. I think this is relevant information that should be included especially given that several news articles have been published with incorrect information. NPR, The New Yorker, and The Conversation all state that this was the first film to be screened at the White House and that's just the first page of Google. I was even taught this during a college media class, which is why I was surprised when I learned it was (technically) wrong. I don't know if reference to Cabiria (the real first film screened on the White House lawn in 1914) is necessary. But removing all mention of the White House Screening seems bad. B-B-B-200 (talk) 23:09, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't now exactly what "myth" you are trying to correct, but there is a dedicated section detailing the screening. It is unnecessary to add details about Cabiria to the lead as it was not screened inside the White House itself. Betty Logan (talk) 23:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]