Jump to content

Talk:University of California, Santa Cruz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleUniversity of California, Santa Cruz was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 9, 2007Good article nomineeListed
February 21, 2010Good article reassessmentKept
February 26, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

US Rankings

[edit]

please update all University of California and California State University rankings. This years rankings are at the us ranking page. https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges

Requested move 22 December 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved per WP:SNOW, considered in the context of the 100+ RMs proposed at once by this user. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:59, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


University of California, Santa CruzUC Santa CruzWP:COMMONNAME. Theparties (talk) 11:19, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I'm Wendy?

[edit]

Here not handing. I am waiting on the Americana population. -34 166.194.158.65 (talk) 21:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Honors English & Art

[edit]

Pe is not required. 166.194.158.65 (talk) 21:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:

  • There are several uncited statements throughout the article.
  • The prose in the "Rankings" section needs to be updated, with older rankings removed and newer rankings added to the text (not just the table).
  • The "Expansion plans" section includes works that are completed. This sections should be updated or removed.

Is anyone willing the address the above concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 20:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. Hog Farm Talk 03:57, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is uncited prose in the article. The prose in the "Rankings" section needs to be updated (table seems updated for now). "Expansion plans" section include projects that have been completed and should be updated as necessary (or the heading name changed). Z1720 (talk) 17:07, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.